Accused, accusers deserve similar rights in investigations

By now, the average sports fan, and the general public for that matter, has heard that Pittsburgh Steelers’ quarterback Ben Roethlisberger has been accused of sexually assaulting a 20-year-old female college student.

This is the second time in his career that he’s been accused of sexual assault, counting the 2008 accusation that was dismissed. The woman in that case has a civil lawsuit pending while Roethlisberger is countersuing for defamation damages.

Most media outlets have a long-standing practice of not naming alleged victims of sexual assault or rape, and rightfully so. But where is the same protection for the alleged perpetrators, which is all that Roethlisberger is at this point?

Many states have sexual offender registry laws requiring those convicted of said crimes to make public their convictions. Those same people are often prohibited from living in certain communities or even holding certain types of jobs. Needless to say, their lives, along with the lives of their victims, are irrevocably changed.

One has to wonder why there is such a rush to judge by the media and to a greater degree, the American public? Roethlisberger’s case provides an example of why there shouldn’t be such a rush and why his name should be as protected as that of the victim. The public is already convicting him based on his previous accusation and, all of a sudden, is viewing this “behavior” as a trend.

Yet, Roethlisberger remains without a conviction on his record.

If he’s found guilty, protocol is in place to make sure the world knows about it, so waiting until then seems like the logical thing to do.

Some argue that high-profile figures who are accused of crimes can buy their way out of trouble and, at the same time, view any dismissal or out-of-court settlements as just as damning as a final conviction. At the same time, the financial status of those figures can be more than enough of a motive for false accusations, and celebrities often do settle out of court to avoid a lengthy prosecution and the media circus that accompanies it.

Ultimately, the truth gets lost along the way. Keeping these situations private would go a long way toward serving true justice or at least avoiding the double standard that the media employs.

opinion@thedailycougar.com

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

One response to “Accused, accusers deserve similar rights in investigations”

  1. Excellent article. We have a system of guilt by accusation that is contrary to our founding values. False rape accusations are a scourge on our society.

Chime in on this discussion

Be forewarned: this is a discussion, so try to make your contribution as relevant as you can muster, significant, without severe and blind(ing) bias, and constructive. We moderate loosely, but that does not license you to hate speech or other acts of linguistic immaturity. Your first comment on the site will be queued for moderation. Register with the site to have your comments published automatically.

Allowed HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>