Columns

Leave reproductive rights to women

When the Pill was first introduced, controversy arose as it was pinned to the reason behind the sexual revolution. For the first time, women were given the choice to separate sex from procreation. Women were able to be proactive in their own reproductive health. They were no longer controlled by the fear of pregnancy and could engage in sexual activity regardless of marital status. The Pill became associated with promiscuity and was cited as the reason behind the sexual revolution. The Pill and other forms of contraception empowered women.

In 1973, Roe V. Wade reinforced women taking active roles in their reproductive health by giving them the right to have abortions. However, these milestones in women’s reproductive health remain challenged.  Four decades later, reproductive rights continue to be contested. Women’s reproductive rights include components such as access to birth control, access to quality reproductive healthcare, and most importantly, access to education and the right to make informed choices. Abortion is often the first reproductive right that comes under fire, but other reproductive rights continue to feel the repercussions.  Women’s empowerment dwindles toward oppression as more restrictions are placed.

Earlier this year, controversy arose when the Susan G. Komen for the Cure announced it would not fund breast cancer screening at Planned Parenthood affiliates. Susan G. Komen quickly overturned its decision when backlash resulted. Although Susan G. Komen agreed to continue to fund Planned Parenthood, it remains evident women’s productive rights continue to be undermined. Abortion is the first right brought to the forefront even when other reproductive rights are involved. Women continue to be disempowered as decisions over their bodies and health are given to other political, religious or corporate entities. A woman’s body is used as a political weapon and continues to be a critical issue that arises in political campaigns and legislation.

In a recent ruling in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Texas will be allowed to cut state funding to Planned Parenthood because of its association with abortion: It is the largest provider of abortion services in the state. Planned Parenthood provides preventative services such as cancer screenings, birth control and well woman exams — 95 percent of funds from Planned Parenthood go toward providing health care services to women.

Decisions about women’s bodies’ continue to be left in the hand of lawmakers who are often out of touch with the reality many women face. Legislators continue to enact restrictions on women’s reproductive health, which is a continuous oppression that assumes women cannot make logical and healthy choices for themselves.

The oppression begins in adolescence. This is exemplified in states such as Mississippi and New Mexico. Neither state requires sex education and have the highest teen pregnancy rates in the country. Young girls are disempowered when their families or schools are not able to educate them about their bodies or sexual health. Stigma and embarrassment remains in sex education, but it is lack of knowledge that reinforces oppressions. There is more focus on maintaining status quo, which includes limited sex education.

The continued debates and policy changes concerning women’s reproductive health challenge decisions made decades ago. Abortion is the most contested of women’s reproductive issues, but contraception and education do not remain free of scrutiny. Empowerment of women in reproductive rights is regressing in a time where we should be progressing.

Stephanie Hernandez is a first year social work graduate student.

6 Comments

  • And men have no rights except to pay for it all. Women want commitment on demand, and “commitment” means open up the wallet and support me in style, buster.”

  • this article started off well with putting a history of the issue into a modern context. However, the writing fell off mid 2nd paragraph. It comes off as rambling more than coherent thoughts concerning the problem of abortion.

    Which is what this article is about… not women’s rights but abortion.

    1) “Decisions about women’s bodies’ continue to be left in the hand of lawmakers who are often out of touch with the reality many women face”

    — Do no women serve in the state or federal congresses? Are there no women in Judicial seats? This is a terrible argument that is easily crushed considering the number of women serving as lawmakers. I doubt you know the background of every one of them. And yes, they are divided concerning these issues

    2) state a source for “95 percent of funds from Planned Parenthood go toward providing health care services to women”.

    –Numerical arguments are MOOT if you don’t even let me know where you got the numbers. For example, 95% of liberal arts majors won’t get a job. see? we can all do it

    3) “The oppression begins in adolescence. This is exemplified in states such as Mississippi and New Mexico. Neither state requires sex education and have the highest teen pregnancy rates in the country.”

    –is it oppression for mothers and fathers to not teach sex education? Instead of attacking the states for not doing it, attack the parents of these teens. Last time i checked it was a parent’s job to raise a child. I see you quickly included families later in the paragraph, but you clearly rest the job with the state. sad…

    4) “The continued debates and policy changes concerning women’s reproductive health challenge decisions made decades ago. ”

    –are we not allowed to change decisions of the past? It’s a good thing we are, otherwise blacks would still be slaves, women could not vote, and alcohol would still be illegal.


    What i find interesting is these debates about abortion revolve around the rights of the mother. What about the rights of the baby? By all scientific evidence a baby in the womb is an independent, living being from conception. Yet it is the lovers of science that are most staunchly pro choice.

    We talk about reproductive rights of women, but what about the flip side… the killing of babies. I understand that it is an inconvenience for a woman to bring a child to term, but are we really going to kill people because it is inconvenient for them to live?

    Joe Biden said in the VP debates this year that he believes a child in the womb is life, yet he does not want to stop other people from having abortions. This is the stance of many people. The problem is that this is effectively saying “I believe you are killing babies, but i’m ok with it because I don’t want to offend you with my beliefs.” In effect, those people are saying they are ok with being accomplices to murder.

    Women are slaves to sex according to our culture. Our society says that women are only empowered when they conquer sex via birth control and abortion. But there is another way. Control over your own body and its desires. How about waiting until you are married? How about putting on a condom? is it too inconvenient? You would rather kill millions of babies because it is inconvenient to take necessary precautions?

    Daniel
    -Ph.D. Candidate – Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics

    • @Daniel “Do no women serve in the state or federal congresses? Are there no women in Judicial seats? This is a terrible argument that is easily crushed considering the number of women serving as lawmakers”.
      If you take the number of women that can have children in the USA and compare that to ALL city,county state, federal lawmakers/judges male or female. It should be obvious to you that it is a small minority determing what a woman can do with her body. And for somebody going for an an advanced degree, saying things like “easily crushed”, makes you more sound more authoritarian than scholarly.

  • Great ideas– only if men have, ” the right of first refusal “, during the first trimester. In other words, formal notification to the mother that he doesn’t want a child and if she goes forward with the pregnancy, she’s legally on her own.

  • Mammograms and PAP smears constitute reproductive health issues, not birth control and abortion. Those constitute avoidance of responsibility for one’s actions.

Leave a Comment