side bar
logo
Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Columns

Blurring the lines: Challenging erasure in film


As filmmakers tell more stories featuring marginalized characters, it seems logical to seek out actors from those groups who would be able to use their personal experiences to authenticate the role while carving out their own sector of the entertainment industry.

Unfortunately, this doesn’t happen as much as many people would like, specifically when roles are performed by actors who are not the same ethnicity as their character.

Hollywood has a shameful history of whitewashing roles, but this casting practice has yet to phase out of the industry. The most recent iteration of this phenomenon occurred when Scarlett Johansson was cast to play the lead in “Ghost in the Shell,” a movie based on a popular Japanese animated series, or anime.

Johansson argues that her character, who is essentially a human brain within a mechanical exoskeleton, lacks any sort of identity, but there is still something cognitively dissonant about casting a white woman for a role that originated in an anime. Perhaps the first indication of racial erasure under the guise of international reach is that Johansson’s character was renamed from Matoko Kusanagi to Major Mira Killian.

While producer Steve Paul comments on the wide range of nationalities cast in the movie, the fact that the main character does not represent the character’s background is concerning. This is especially true when they could have just cast a Japanese woman.

This narrative of casting someone who has not had the cultural experiences relevant to a role continues in the film “3 Generations,” in theaters May 5, in which Elle Fanning plays a transgender boy.

There has been plenty of backlash from the LGBTQ community about her failure to find an actor who fit the bill of the intended character (a pre-transition trans male) as well as the excuses she gives for being unable to do so; director Gaby Dellal comments that if she were to create the film in 2017, she “absolutely would be casting a trans kid.” Even though she worked closely with LGBTQ acitvist nonprofit GLAAD, giving a role clearly made for a trans-person to a cis-gendered woman justifiably warrants dissent.

It’s important to recognize the necessity of roles depicting marginalized groups, and while it’s not always feasible, for them to be performed by an actor who has lived through those experiences.

Representation in film has a huge impact on individuals who identify with these stories because it allows them to see their lives reflected and understood, and it would be detrimental for the industry to continue overlooking minority actors and stories that don’t fit the mainstream.

Columnist Jackie Wostrel is a public relations freshman and can be reached at opinion@thedailycougar.com

Tags: , ,


  • Opa

    So, using your logic, only white men should star in Hamilton.

  • Oneidiotatatime

    I disagree with the “Hamilton” comment as the founding fathers were not marginalized in the sense I beleive intended by the writer. And while I appreciate the writer’s point of being sensitive to marginalized people of all definitions, I beleive we lost sight of the fact that the movie in question was not a PSA but an actual product of an actual business. While they may not be drilling for oil, or cutting down the rain forests to make nice floors for the 1%, the reality is that the movie industry is just that, an industry. It’s objective, actually their obligation, is to create a product that will produce a return for their investors. The studios, production companies, theatres, actors, writers, crew members, advertisers, collectively make up this industry. And I’m sure many of the individuals that benefit from a successful/profitable production are in fact marginalized in some manner. And the reality is that Ms. Johansson, in the estimate of all involved, was the best business decision to produce a profitable product. In fact, going back to the Hamilton example, using marginalized performers in this situation proves tinned a great business decision. Profits are a good thing.

  • CoogsHouse713

    Yet another DC column where it’s difficult to determine if satire or not.

    Here’s a radical concept: How about we let the best actors and actresses perform in these roles, and not only because of the color of their skin?

Back to Top ↑
  • Sign up for our Email Edition

  • Polls

    Does the construction along Spur 5, which will eventually impact the U.S. 59 north and south on-ramps from I-45, affect your commute to class?

    • Yes, my commute will be dramatically different and much longer (36%, 38 Votes)
    • My commute will be slightly impacted, but it's not too much of a nuisance (29%, 31 Votes)
    • I don't commute/ I never use I-45 or Spur 5 (23%, 24 Votes)
    • I commute but had no idea about the construction (12%, 13 Votes)

    Total Voters: 106

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Recent articles

  • Special Sections